edmarriner

Just wondering is any agrees that most payment gateways charge too much when small amounts of money is transfered. It is not really worth transfering anything less than $5 as paypal take a nice big chunk out of it.

Jerlene

Of course it's worth it. That's what it takes to keep it running so I'm fine with that. Without it I wouldn't be able to do my online transactions so I'm fine with it. It could stand to be a bit lower but it's alright.

__________________
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

jedi

Paypal is not ideal for micropayments. For bulk payments, that is where Paypal is advantageous. Egold is a better option for micropayments.

Jerlene

PayPal took away $5 from the $150 I received today. It's a bit much but at least it stops there.

__________________
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

waffles

Someone wanted me to do a job for $0.50 one time, and I was going to do it until I noticed that I would have only gotten $0.19 out of it. Not the best of deals, but 2.9% + $0.30 really isn't that bad once you get up to so much. I just wish they would cap the prices off somewhere.

__________________
Waffles Radio Playing Music That You Didn't Know You Wanted To Hear
Sapid Existence Pictures
Juggle Chainsaws Everything Else

web-legent

Yeah paypal is very costly . specially for small ammount of transection . so you can go with e-gold.

AdnanAhsan

i think moneybooker and e-gold are good at all, there fees are quite affordable, and i am using both with satisfaction, i got full payment from my client into my moneybooker account without any fees..

__________________
Earn money for Sure

Jerlene

They should have a minimum or something. Only take money from $10+ transactions.

__________________
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

preyank

yeh. its not too good if your transaction is less than $5. :

Mr.Lee

I think paypal is right and ideal.E-gold charges for micro payments too